I ticked off another “thing to do before I die” last month when I attended the annual wine-tasting day in Châteauneuf-du-Pape, which was the very image of la belle vie of rural France, apart from the four soldiers with machine guns plus three policemen with handguns. France is swarming with heavily armed guys looking effortlessly cool as they defend us from the country’s endless supply of Islamist crazies, but the national emergency hasn’t affected the spirit of most Frenchmen, who seem as miserable as normal.
Being a political junkie, I was looking forward to switching off from politics, having found the Brexit referendum especially dire. But just as temporary periods without booze are apparently no use if one continues to abuse the stuff, I’m not sure news detox does me any good. Political partisanship is addictive, and like most addictions not just personally destructive, but also socially corrosive; in this case it inflames the same sense of moral outrage and righteousness that once inspired sectarian conflict in Europe.
Indeed, just as print triggered two centuries of ideological conflict on our continent, so digital is doing the same, and Brexit is just a taste of things to come. The vote exposed huge fault lines between social classes, regions, generations and most of all worldviews, in particular the division between globalists and nationalists. Those choosing to leave were not the economically “left behind”, but were motivated by social values; as the LSE’s Eric Kaufmann noted, the referendum was about “order versus openness”, with strong correlations between support for Leave and core socially conservative beliefs such as capital punishment.
For all the civility and twee of the subsequent handover of power, Theresa May has inherited a country more divided than at any time since the 19th century. It’s been deeply unpleasant, and made me finally understand why the English like to talk about the weather so much – we don’t handle contentious political subjects well.
It is hardly surprising that Britain is so split, having in the past few decades gone through a social revolution as dramatic as the Reformation. In the 16th century, England had two competing worldviews at loggerheads: the old conservative religion, which was still firmly established in rural areas and led by a few aristocrats; and the radical new creed, concentrated among the middle class with strongholds in cities like London and Cambridge, the universities and legal profession.
The old faith provided the security and social cohesion most people craved; the new offered radical ideas about salvation and a war on sin, although for today’s Godly (as the Puritans called themselves) it’s the sins of racism, sexism and homophobia that must be driven out.
How to continue reading…
This article appears in the Catholic Herald magazine - to read it in full subscribe to our digital edition from just 30p a week
The Catholic Herald is your essential weekly guide to the Catholic world; latest news, incisive opinion, expert analysis and spiritual reflection